Two federal courts hold the use of copyrighted books by Meta and Anthropic as training data for AI systems does not infringe ...

Claude maker Anthropic's use of copyright-protected books in its AI training process was "exceedingly transformative" and ...

Ultimately, because authors introduced no evidence that Meta's AI threatened to dilute their markets, Chhabria ruled that ...

The first-of-its-kind ruling that condones AI training as fair use will likely be viewed as a big win for AI companies, but ...

Federal judges side with AI developers in copyright cases, citing fair use while acknowledging potential market impact of AI ...

Training Claude on copyrighted books it purchased was fair use, but piracy wasn't, the judge ruled.

A federal judge sided with Meta in a lawsuit that alleged the company had illegally trained its AI models on copyrighted ...

A summary of select court decisions addressing whether the use of copyrighted materials to train generative AI (GenAI) tools constitutes fair use.

In a test case for the artificial intelligence industry, a federal judge has ruled that AI company Anthropic didn’t break the ...

The authors requested a court order blocking Microsoft's infringement and statutory damages of up to $150K for each work ...