The Section 11A starts with a non-obstante clause. Consequently, in case of any conflict between proposed Section 11A and any other provisions in the GST Act, proposed Section 11A shall prevail.

In the case of Globus Logisys Pvt Ltd Vs Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, the Calcutta High Court addressed the issue of a ...

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued revised guidelines for Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs) concerning data submission to Credit Information Companies (CICs). ARCs are now required to become ...

In July 2022, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) proposed significant changes to the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015, through a consultation paper specifically ...

In the case of Sai Carriers Vs State of U.P., the Allahabad High Court addressed the cancellation of the petitioner’s GST license due to unpaid taxes. The GST license was revoked by the Assistant ...

3. We however note that insofar as the present appeals are concerned and which are confined to Assessment Years2 2010-2011 and 2012-2013, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal3 quite apart from resting ...

State of UP and Others, the Allahabad High Court ruled that Poker and Rummy are skill-based games, not gambling. The ...

In the case of Anil Kumar Dogra Vs. Income Tax Officer, the Himachal Pradesh High Court stayed a notice issued under Section ...

Delhi HC Rejects Plea Against Election Of BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra To Rajya Sabha And Imposes Fine ...

Request for Expression of Interest (EOIs) For Empanelment of Chartered Accountants/Chartered Accountant Firms/ Cost Accountants/Cost Accountant Firms, for Special Audit of GST registered persons under ...

Krones Aktiengesellschaft, the Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (ITAT) decision that Krones’ Indian subsidiary, KIPL, does not constitute a ...

An affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner evidencing service of notice of the writ petition along with the documents having been served upon the respondent No.1. Learned counsel for the ...